Prime numbers
module elementary-number-theory.prime-numbers where
Imports
open import elementary-number-theory.decidable-types open import elementary-number-theory.divisibility-natural-numbers open import elementary-number-theory.equality-natural-numbers open import elementary-number-theory.inequality-natural-numbers open import elementary-number-theory.multiplication-natural-numbers open import elementary-number-theory.natural-numbers open import elementary-number-theory.proper-divisors-natural-numbers open import elementary-number-theory.strict-inequality-natural-numbers open import foundation.cartesian-product-types open import foundation.contractible-types open import foundation.coproduct-types open import foundation.decidable-types open import foundation.dependent-pair-types open import foundation.empty-types open import foundation.fundamental-theorem-of-identity-types open import foundation.identity-types open import foundation.logical-equivalences open import foundation.negation open import foundation.propositions open import foundation.unit-type open import foundation.universe-levels
Idea
A prime number is a natural number of which 1 is the only proper divisor.
Definition
The main definition of prime numbers
This is a direct interpretation of what it means to be prime.
is-prime-ℕ : ℕ → UU lzero is-prime-ℕ n = (x : ℕ) → (is-proper-divisor-ℕ n x ↔ is-one-ℕ x) Prime-ℕ : UU lzero Prime-ℕ = Σ ℕ is-prime-ℕ module _ (p : Prime-ℕ) where nat-Prime-ℕ : ℕ nat-Prime-ℕ = pr1 p is-prime-Prime-ℕ : is-prime-ℕ nat-Prime-ℕ is-prime-Prime-ℕ = pr2 p
Second definition of prime numbers
This is an implementation of the idea of being prime, which is usually taken as the definition.
is-one-is-proper-divisor-ℕ : ℕ → UU lzero is-one-is-proper-divisor-ℕ n = (x : ℕ) → is-proper-divisor-ℕ n x → is-one-ℕ x is-prime-easy-ℕ : ℕ → UU lzero is-prime-easy-ℕ n = (is-not-one-ℕ n) × (is-one-is-proper-divisor-ℕ n)
Third definition of prime numbers
has-unique-proper-divisor-ℕ : ℕ → UU lzero has-unique-proper-divisor-ℕ n = is-contr (Σ ℕ (is-proper-divisor-ℕ n))
Properties
The number 0
is not a prime
is-nonzero-is-prime-ℕ : (n : ℕ) → is-prime-ℕ n → is-nonzero-ℕ n is-nonzero-is-prime-ℕ n H p = is-not-one-two-ℕ ( pr1 ( H 2) ( tr (λ n → ¬ (2 = n)) (inv (p)) ( is-nonzero-two-ℕ), tr (λ n → div-ℕ 2 n) (inv p) (0 , refl)))
The number 1
is not a prime
is-not-one-is-prime-ℕ : (n : ℕ) → is-prime-ℕ n → is-not-one-ℕ n is-not-one-is-prime-ℕ n H p = pr1 (pr2 (H 1) refl) (inv p)
A prime is strictly greater than 1
le-one-is-prime-ℕ : (n : ℕ) → is-prime-ℕ n → le-ℕ 1 n le-one-is-prime-ℕ 0 x = ex-falso (is-nonzero-is-prime-ℕ 0 x refl) le-one-is-prime-ℕ 1 x = ex-falso (is-not-one-is-prime-ℕ 1 x refl) le-one-is-prime-ℕ (succ-ℕ (succ-ℕ n)) x = star
Being a prime is a proposition
is-prop-is-prime-ℕ : (n : ℕ) → is-prop (is-prime-ℕ n) is-prop-is-prime-ℕ n = is-prop-Π ( λ x → is-prop-prod ( is-prop-Π (λ p → is-set-ℕ x 1)) ( is-prop-Π (λ p → is-prop-is-proper-divisor-ℕ n x))) is-prime-ℕ-Prop : (n : ℕ) → Prop lzero pr1 (is-prime-ℕ-Prop n) = is-prime-ℕ n pr2 (is-prime-ℕ-Prop n) = is-prop-is-prime-ℕ n is-prop-has-unique-proper-divisor-ℕ : (n : ℕ) → is-prop (has-unique-proper-divisor-ℕ n) is-prop-has-unique-proper-divisor-ℕ n = is-property-is-contr
The three definitions of primes are equivalent
is-prime-easy-is-prime-ℕ : (n : ℕ) → is-prime-ℕ n → is-prime-easy-ℕ n pr1 (is-prime-easy-is-prime-ℕ n H) = is-not-one-is-prime-ℕ n H pr2 (is-prime-easy-is-prime-ℕ n H) x = pr1 (H x) is-prime-is-prime-easy-ℕ : (n : ℕ) → is-prime-easy-ℕ n → is-prime-ℕ n pr1 (is-prime-is-prime-easy-ℕ n H x) = pr2 H x pr1 (pr2 (is-prime-is-prime-easy-ℕ n H .(succ-ℕ zero-ℕ)) refl) q = pr1 H (inv q) pr2 (pr2 (is-prime-is-prime-easy-ℕ n H .(succ-ℕ zero-ℕ)) refl) = div-one-ℕ n has-unique-proper-divisor-is-prime-ℕ : (n : ℕ) → is-prime-ℕ n → has-unique-proper-divisor-ℕ n has-unique-proper-divisor-is-prime-ℕ n H = fundamental-theorem-id' ( λ x p → pr2 (H x) (inv p)) ( λ x → is-equiv-is-prop ( is-set-ℕ 1 x) ( is-prop-is-proper-divisor-ℕ n x) ( λ p → inv (pr1 (H x) p))) is-prime-has-unique-proper-divisor-ℕ : (n : ℕ) → has-unique-proper-divisor-ℕ n → is-prime-ℕ n pr1 (is-prime-has-unique-proper-divisor-ℕ n H x) K = ap pr1 ( eq-is-contr H { pair x K} { pair 1 (is-proper-divisor-one-is-proper-divisor-ℕ K)}) pr2 (is-prime-has-unique-proper-divisor-ℕ n H .1) refl = is-proper-divisor-one-is-proper-divisor-ℕ (pr2 (center H))
Being a prime is decidable
is-decidable-is-prime-easy-ℕ : (n : ℕ) → is-decidable (is-prime-easy-ℕ n) is-decidable-is-prime-easy-ℕ zero-ℕ = inr ( λ H → is-not-one-two-ℕ (pr2 H 2 (is-proper-divisor-zero-succ-ℕ 1))) is-decidable-is-prime-easy-ℕ (succ-ℕ n) = is-decidable-prod ( is-decidable-neg (is-decidable-is-one-ℕ (succ-ℕ n))) ( is-decidable-bounded-Π-ℕ ( is-proper-divisor-ℕ (succ-ℕ n)) ( is-one-ℕ) ( is-decidable-is-proper-divisor-ℕ (succ-ℕ n)) ( is-decidable-is-one-ℕ) ( succ-ℕ n) ( λ x H → leq-div-succ-ℕ x n (pr2 H))) is-decidable-is-prime-ℕ : (n : ℕ) → is-decidable (is-prime-ℕ n) is-decidable-is-prime-ℕ n = is-decidable-iff ( is-prime-is-prime-easy-ℕ n) ( is-prime-easy-is-prime-ℕ n) ( is-decidable-is-prime-easy-ℕ n)
The number 2
is a prime
is-one-is-proper-divisor-two-ℕ : is-one-is-proper-divisor-ℕ 2 is-one-is-proper-divisor-two-ℕ zero-ℕ (pair f (pair k p)) = ex-falso (f (inv (right-zero-law-mul-ℕ k) ∙ p)) is-one-is-proper-divisor-two-ℕ (succ-ℕ zero-ℕ) (pair f H) = refl is-one-is-proper-divisor-two-ℕ (succ-ℕ (succ-ℕ zero-ℕ)) (pair f H) = ex-falso (f refl) is-one-is-proper-divisor-two-ℕ (succ-ℕ (succ-ℕ (succ-ℕ x))) (pair f H) = ex-falso (leq-div-succ-ℕ (succ-ℕ (succ-ℕ (succ-ℕ x))) 1 H) is-prime-easy-two-ℕ : is-prime-easy-ℕ 2 pr1 is-prime-easy-two-ℕ = Eq-eq-ℕ pr2 is-prime-easy-two-ℕ = is-one-is-proper-divisor-two-ℕ is-prime-two-ℕ : is-prime-ℕ 2 is-prime-two-ℕ = is-prime-is-prime-easy-ℕ 2 is-prime-easy-two-ℕ
If a prime number p
divides a nonzero number x
, then x/p < x
le-quotient-div-is-prime-ℕ : (p x : ℕ) → is-nonzero-ℕ x → is-prime-ℕ p → (H : div-ℕ p x) → le-ℕ (quotient-div-ℕ p x H) x le-quotient-div-is-prime-ℕ p x N P H = le-quotient-div-ℕ p x N H (is-not-one-is-prime-ℕ p P)
If a prime number p
divides a number x + 1
, then (x + 1)/p ≤ x
leq-quotient-div-is-prime-ℕ : (p x : ℕ) → is-prime-ℕ p → (H : div-ℕ p (succ-ℕ x)) → leq-ℕ (quotient-div-ℕ p (succ-ℕ x) H) x leq-quotient-div-is-prime-ℕ p x P H = leq-le-succ-ℕ ( quotient-div-ℕ p (succ-ℕ x) H) ( x) ( le-quotient-div-is-prime-ℕ p (succ-ℕ x) (is-nonzero-succ-ℕ x) P H)
See also
- The fundamental theorem of arithmetic asserts that every positive natural
number can be written uniquely as a product of primes. This theorem is proven
in
fundamental-theorem-of-arithmetic
.